THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.33333 of 2025

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the action of respondent Nos.3 to 6 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 19.12.2016 and not initiating any action to allow the land to construct the graveyard to the Debbedaguda Village, Kandukur Mandal, Rangareddy District, the present writ petition is filed. A consequential prayer is sought to direct the respondent Nos.3 to 6 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 19.12.2016 and to allot the land for construction of graveyard.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner by relying upon the leaflet, which has been published on 07.07.2025 disclosing that a hunger strike would be conducted at Debbedaguda Mandal, Kandukur, Mandal, Rangareddy District, for conducting a procession to the office of respondent No.4 requesting to grant / allocate necessary space in Survey No.59 for the purpose of constructing a graveyard. He further submitted that no action has been taken by the official respondents on the said leaflet. Aggrieved by such inaction of official respondent No.4, the present writ petition is filed. He further submitted that at the same time, the petitioner has made a representation dated 19.12.2016 to respondent No.3 alleging that some venture has been undertaken illegally by encroaching the said land in Survey No.59 by some unknown persons and subsequently the property was sold to some private persons and had brought the said fact to the notice of the unofficial respondent No.3. But no action has been taken on the petitioner’s representation dated 19.12.2016 and hence seeks to pass appropriate directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue on the other hand submitted that there is no representation as such made by the petitioner, as seen from the material papers of the writ petition and no such representation is enclosed to the writ petition. Hence it is bereft of any valid reasons to entertain the said writ petition in the present form. He further submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 19.12.2016 submitted to respondent No.3 does not bear any acknowledgment of the official respondent No.3 and it is completely contrary to the submissions made by the petitioner’s counsel and submitted that this writ petition does not stand on merits and seeks to dismiss this writ petition on merits.

5. This Court having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and on perusing the material placed before this Court and on examining the same, is of the opinion that in the absence of any valid representation in consonance with the relief as sought for in this writ petition, and since the petitioner’s representation dated 19.12.2016 does not bear any acknowledgement of the office of the official respondent No.3, this Court cannot direct the official respondents to act upon the said representation. This writ petition is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed.

6. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, in this petition, shall stand closed.

____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J

Date: 04.11.2025

Nsk