IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
Sri Ravinder Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana and 8 Others – Respondent
WP 33866/2022
WRIT PETITION No.33866 OF 2022
O R D E R:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“…to pass an Order, Direction or Writ and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in registering sale deed dated 10-06-2019 as document No.6318/2019 executed by the respondents No.6 & 7 in favour of the respondents No.8 & 9 in respect of land admeasuring acres 1-15 guntas in Survey No.654/1, situated at Janwada Village, Shankarpally mandal, Ranga Reddy district, though the same was already sold to the petitioner under the sale deed dated 11-09-2017 registered as document No.3425/2017 of the office of the Sub-Registrar, Shankarpally, and of not taking action in spite of the complaints of the petitioner dated 29-12-2021, as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, without jurisdiction, vitiated by fraud, contrary to the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, violative of principles of natural justice and Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to declare said sale deed and other proceedings as null and void, to set aside and cancel the same in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders…”
2. It is the case of petitioner that respondent No.5 registered the sale deed dated 10.06.2019, executed by respondent Nos.6 and 7 in favour of respondent Nos.8 and 9, as document No.6318/2019 (Ex.P1-Page No.14) in respect of land admeasuring Ac.1.15 guntas in Sy.No.654/1, situated at Janwada Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. That the subject property was sold to petitioner under sale deed dated 11.09.2017, registered as document No.3425/2017 (Ex.P2-Page No.22) in the office of Sub-Registrar, Shankarpally. That in spite of complaint by petitioner on 29.12.2021, Sub-
Registrar has not taken any action, hence, the writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner intends not to press the writ petition and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, J WRIT PETITION No.33866 OF 2022
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.