THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25779 OF 2015

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:

“… declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in interfering with the petitioners property rights over the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.03 guntas in Sy.No.60, situated at Madinaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, confining in the Police Station illegally, and also the inaction in the part of the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in not acting on the representation of the petitioner dated 10.08.2015 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Articles 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to take stringent action against the respondent Nos.5 to 7 on considering the averments made in the representation dated 10.08.2015 and provide necessary security to the petitioner and the subject matter of the property owned by the petitioner…”

2. Heard Sri K.Ananda Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri B.Sridhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.

3. The Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents refers to a detailed counter affidavit filed by respondent No.4 disclosing the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 to 7 including the complaints made by them against each other before various Courts and forums.

4. It is further stated by respondent No.4 that the petitioner lodged a complaint basing on which a case vide Cr.No.517 of 2015 under Sections 341, 447, 506 and 188 of IPC dated 09.08.2015 was registered before Miyapur Police Station and the police had taken up the investigation. It is also stated that while, the investigation was pending, the petitioner addressed a representation dated 10.08.2015 to the Commissioner of Police, Deputy Commissioner of Police and Assistant Commissioner of Police, contending that certain offences relating to the ownership of the subject land covered by O.S.No.988 of 2015, were not properly registered under the relevant provisions, including Sections 465 and 468 of IPC in Cr.No.385 of 2015. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the said sections were omitted while registering the said crime. Further, the petitioner also alleged that the police are interfering in civil disputes. However, respondent No.4 has clarified in the counter that the police were only conducting investigation in the said registered crime and that the police never interfered in civil disputes between the parties.

5. Recording the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the police not to interfere in civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 to 7 or in respect of the property claimed by the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________________ JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Date: 31.10.2025 vjb