THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA SECOND APPEAL No.434 of 2025

JUDGMENT:

Heard Sri A. Venkatesh, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Sriram Polali, learned counsel for the appellant on admission. Perused the entire record.

2. This Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant/appellant/plaintiff aggrieved by the common judgment and decree dated 02.04.2025 in A.S.No.173 of 2022 (Old A.S.No.02 of 2019) and I.A.No.1284 of 2023 and I.A.No.1370 of 2024 and I.A.No.1285 of 2023 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kushaiguda, (‘First Appellate Court’), wherein the appeal was dismissed confirming judgment and decree dated 26.11.2018 in O.S.No.695 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, (‘Trial Court’), wherein suit filed for perpetual injunction against the respondents/respondents/ defendants, has been dismissed.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed suit for perpetual injunction against the respondents claiming to be absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring 3240 square yards out of 4000 square yards in Sy.No.105 (part) situated at Medipally Village,