SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66391

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
P LAKSHMI HYD AND 18 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF SECRETARY STATE OF TS. HYD AND 8 OTHERS – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

O R D E R:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in not implementing the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2014, as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the procedure laid down under the said Act and also contrary to the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to implement the provisions of the said Act and further direct the Respondent Nos. 4 to 9 not to harass the Petitioners by imposing fine, eviction, confiscation of goods, etc., and pass such other and further orders…”

2. I have heard Mr. Mogili Anaveni, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. D. Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mallesham, learned counsel, representing G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top