IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Sri.D.Krishna Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sri.Sanjay Sambrani – Respondent
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
COMMON ORDER
Heard Sri. Mehboob Ali, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/plaintiff and Sri. V.Atchuta Ram, learned counsel for the respondent/defendant.
2. Since both the Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of the same issue, they are analogously heard together and being disposed of by this common order.
3. Civil Revision Petition No.522 of 2025: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff to set aside the order dated 31.12.2024 passed in I.A. No. 627 of 2024 in O.S. No. 4712 of 2022 by the learned IX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (for short, ‘the trial Court’). By the impugned order, the petition filed by the respondent/defendant under Section 5 of the limitation Act, 1963, to condone the delay of 672 days in filing the petition for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 09.01.2023, was allowed by the trial Court.
4. Civil Revision Petition No.552 of 2025: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff to set aside the order dated 31.12.2024 passed in I.A. No. 628 of 2024 in O.S. No. 4712 of 2022 by the learned IX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.