SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66477

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Sri.D.Krishna Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sri.Sanjay Sambrani – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

COMMON ORDER

Heard Sri. Mehboob Ali, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/plaintiff and Sri. V.Atchuta Ram, learned counsel for the respondent/defendant.

2. Since both the Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of the same issue, they are analogously heard together and being disposed of by this common order.

3. Civil Revision Petition No.522 of 2025: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff to set aside the order dated 31.12.2024 passed in I.A. No. 627 of 2024 in O.S. No. 4712 of 2022 by the learned IX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (for short, ‘the trial Court’). By the impugned order, the petition filed by the respondent/defendant under Section 5 of the limitation Act, 1963, to condone the delay of 672 days in filing the petition for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 09.01.2023, was allowed by the trial Court.

4. Civil Revision Petition No.552 of 2025: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff to set aside the order dated 31.12.2024 passed in I.A. No. 628 of 2024 in O.S. No. 4712 of 2022 by the learned IX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top