SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66617

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Mohd. Sadiq – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Mastan Vali – Respondent


THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2357 OF 2025 Mr. B. Dhananjaya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

Ms. Ch.Kanaka Durga, learned counsel representing Ms.T.Vanaja, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

ORDER:

1. The Civil Revision Petition arises out of an order dated 02.04.2025 in I.A.No.50 of 2023 in O.S.No.519 of 2022 passed by the Senior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at Kukatpally dismissing an application filed by the petitioners herein under Order VII Rule 11 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for rejection of the plaint in the suit in O.S.No.519 of 2022 filed by the respondent.

2. Counsel appearing for the petitioners is unable to inform the Court as to the ground under which the IA was filed. Counsel submits that the application was filed on the ground that the suit is not maintainable.

3. Counsel appearing for the respondent/plaintiff is represented.

4. The suit was filed in 2017 in O.S.No.1884 of 2017 and transferred and renumbered as O.S.No.519 of 2022.

5. The petitioners are the defendants in the suit. Counsel appearing for the petitioners/defend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top