SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66701

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Banoth Rajitha – Appellant
Versus
Vaddiraju Jayasree – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

ORDER:

Heard Sri P.Hari Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri I.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the impugned dismissal Docket Order dated 04.05.2018 passed in I.A.No.99 of 2017 in O.S.No.19 of 2012 on the file of the VII Additional Junior Civil Judge at Warangal.

3. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for an appointment of Advocate Commissioner for the purpose of noting down the physical features to elicit, in which the Survey number of the suit schedule property and the structure is situated with the help of Mandal Surveyor for better adjudication of the matter.

4. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/plaintiff has filed the suit against the respondent/defendant seeking a perpetual injunction and another separate application for another ad-interim injunction contending that the petitioner/plaintiff is the owner and possessor of the agricultural land out of Sy.No.375/1/4 to an extent of Acs.0.20 guntas situated at Palivelpula village, Hanumak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top