IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Mohammed Niyazuddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY ORDER : (ORAL)
Heard Mr. Md. Fasiuddin, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Putta Krishna Reddy, learned standing counsel for Municipalities, appearing for respondent No.2.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that acting upon the complaints of the petitioner, show-cause notice vide Notice No.UCR.No.G1/MCJ/W30/735/2024 dated 12.07.2024 was issued to respondent No.3 to explain as to why the unauthorized construction made by her in the property bearing H.No.5-1-102, Rahamathpura, Jagtial, should not be removed. Subsequently, speaking order vide UCR.No.G1/MCJ/W30/735/2024 dated 08.08.2024 was also passed. Further, final notice dated 31.12.2024 was also issued to respondent the subject property.
3. It is submitted that respondent No.2 addressed letters dated 25.04.2025 and 28.05.2025 to the Superintending Engineer, TSNPDCL, Jagtial, stating that the officials of respondent No.2 have inspected the subject property and found that the building was constructed in deviation of the sanctioned plan. Respondent No.3 was also directed to submit explanation. As respondent No.3 failed to submit any explanation, speaking order dated 08.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.