SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66782

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Mohammed Niyazuddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY ORDER : (ORAL)

Heard Mr. Md. Fasiuddin, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Putta Krishna Reddy, learned standing counsel for Municipalities, appearing for respondent No.2.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that acting upon the complaints of the petitioner, show-cause notice vide Notice No.UCR.No.G1/MCJ/W30/735/2024 dated 12.07.2024 was issued to respondent No.3 to explain as to why the unauthorized construction made by her in the property bearing H.No.5-1-102, Rahamathpura, Jagtial, should not be removed. Subsequently, speaking order vide UCR.No.G1/MCJ/W30/735/2024 dated 08.08.2024 was also passed. Further, final notice dated 31.12.2024 was also issued to respondent the subject property.

3. It is submitted that respondent No.2 addressed letters dated 25.04.2025 and 28.05.2025 to the Superintending Engineer, TSNPDCL, Jagtial, stating that the officials of respondent No.2 have inspected the subject property and found that the building was constructed in deviation of the sanctioned plan. Respondent No.3 was also directed to submit explanation. As respondent No.3 failed to submit any explanation, speaking order dated 08.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top