SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66868

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Dadala Danial Raju – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 12589/2025



THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12589 OF 2025

ORDER :

This criminal petition is filed under Section 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioners/A.1 to A.3 seeking their enlargement on bail in connection with Crime No.141 of 2025 of Excise Ghatkesar Police Station, Medchal District. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Section 8(c) r/w.22(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’)

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 30.08.2025 the police apprehended the petitioners herein near Bhagyanagar Nandanavanam Park, Narapally, Ghatkesar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District and seized 31.35 grams (gross) and 22.85 grams (net) of MDMA along with two wheeler and some mobile phones. It is alleged that A.1 and A.2 went to Bangalore on 18.08.2025, purchased 25 grams of MDMA and A.3 paid Rs.17,000/- to A.1 and A.2 for procuring 12 grams of MDMA. Hence, complaint was registered against the accused for the above offences.

3. Heard Sri B.Rama Shankara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are innocent of the alleged offences and they have not committed any offences. The petitioners are in jail from 31.08.2025 and they are ready to cooperate with the investigation and undertake to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, prayed this Court to grant bail to the petitioners.

5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail on the ground that the quantity involved in this case is commercial quantity and in view of rigor of Section 37 of NDPS Act, petitioners are not entitled for bail and requested this Court to dismiss this petition.

6. Considering the submissions made by the respective counsel and the material placed on record, the petitioners herein were found in possession of huge quantity of MDMA which is a commercial quantity. Though petitioners are in jail from 31.08.2025, it is not a ground to grant bail to them. At this stage, it is pertinent to note Section 37 of the NDPS Act, and the same reads as under :

“37. Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable. -- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974),-- (a) every offence punishable under this Act shall be cognizable;

(b) no person accused of an offence punishable for 1[offences under section 19 or section 24 or section 27A and also for offences involving commercial quantity] shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless--

(i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for such release, and (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.

(2) The limitations on granting of bail specified in clause (b) of sub-section (1) are in addition to the limitations under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force on granting of bail.”

7. In view thereof, Section 37 of the NDPS Act mandates that offences involving commercial quantities be non-bailable, requiring reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences while on bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case on hand, this Court is not satisfied that conditions for granting bail under Section 37 are met. Therefore, the Criminal Petition lacks merit and the same is liable to be dismissed.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_______________

K. SUJANA, J Date :23.10.2025

Rds

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top