SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66935

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Motku Dongayya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 31761/2025



THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.31761 of 2025

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action on the representations of the petitioner dated08.06.2011, 30.11.2017, 14.03.2018 and 17.03.2025 for rectification of the revenue records pertaining the land in Sy.No.577 admeasuring Ac.1.32 guntas of Madutla Revenue Village, Malyala Mandal, Jagtial District (hereinafter will be referred to as ‘subject property’) and in wrongly recording other names in Dharani, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to rectify the revenue records and Dharani entries and record the names of the petitioners as pattadars in respect of the subject property.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is absolute owner and possessor of the subject property, having purchased the same through registered sale deed bearing document No.2352 of 2008. Ever since the date of purchase, the petitioner is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. However, the name of one Rajavva was wrongly entered in the place of Katta Rajamma. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner made several representations on 08.06.2011, 30.11.2017, 14.03.2018 and latest being on 17.03.2025. Despite receiving and acknowledging the same, the respondents did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents, petitioner filed the present writ petition.

4. Whereas Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that the respondent authorities will consider the online application, if filed in accordance with the provisions of the Bhu Bharathi Act, 2025 and the Rules made thereunder, strictly in accordance with law.

5. In the light of the said submission, without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file appropriate F-line application in accordance with the provisions of Bhu Bharathi Act, 2025 and the Rules made thereunder. On filing such application, the respondents 2 to 4 are directed to consider the same, strictly in accordance with law, by putting the petitioner and all other interested parties on notice and afford an opportunity of hearing. He shall complete the said exercise within a period of 45 working days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J Date:23.10.2025.

kvs THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.31761 of 2025 Date: 23.10.2025 KVS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top