SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66967

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
S. Srinivas Rao – Appellant
Versus
M. Venkata Singaiah – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1511 OF 2021

ORDER:

Heard Sri Ravi Teja, learned counsel representing Sri A.Veera Swamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.V.Ramakrishna, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Sai Gangadhar, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 03.08.2021 in I.A.No.118 of 2021 in I.A.No.47 of 2021 in O.S.No.314 of 2021, on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate Special Mobile Court-cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, rejecting the petitioner’s request for appointment of Advocate Commissioner for the limited purpose of noting down the physical features of the suit schedule property in I.A.No.118 of 2021.

3. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff on the following grounds contending that the learned Trial Court erred in considering the application for appointment of Advocate Commissioner for limited purpose of noting down the physical features of the suit schedule property which is warranted. Further, the learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top