IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
S. Srinivas Rao – Appellant
Versus
M. Venkata Singaiah – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1511 OF 2021
ORDER:
Heard Sri Ravi Teja, learned counsel representing Sri A.Veera Swamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.V.Ramakrishna, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Sai Gangadhar, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 03.08.2021 in I.A.No.118 of 2021 in I.A.No.47 of 2021 in O.S.No.314 of 2021, on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate Special Mobile Court-cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, rejecting the petitioner’s request for appointment of Advocate Commissioner for the limited purpose of noting down the physical features of the suit schedule property in I.A.No.118 of 2021.
3. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff on the following grounds contending that the learned Trial Court erred in considering the application for appointment of Advocate Commissioner for limited purpose of noting down the physical features of the suit schedule property which is warranted. Further, the learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.