SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66968

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
K ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
K GANESH (DEID) per LRs D1 D2 – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1792 OF 2018

O R D E R:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the Order, dated 28.02.2018 passed in I.A.No.137 of 2017 in O.S.No.152 of 2014 on the file of I Additional Chief District Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad.

2. Heard Sri B.S. Prasad, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Swetha Pamidi, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri Emmidala Kotaiah, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3.

3. The revision petitioners are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants before the trial Court. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter the parties are referred to as they arrayed before the trial Court.

4. The brief facts of the case are that plaintiff Nos.1 and 2/Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 filed a suit for eviction of the defendants and possession. The defendants filed a written statement-cum- counter claim on 14.03.2015 seeking a relief for partition of suit schedule property into three equal parts by metes and bounds by appointing an ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top