SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 66991

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Smt. Kandela Julie Lavania – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar – Respondent


THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3733 of 2025

ORDER:

The present CRP is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 20.08.2025 passed in I.A.no.284 of 2025 in CFR No.507 of 2025 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Medak.

2. Petitioners are the plaintiffs in CFR No.507 of 2025.

3. At the time of filing of the suit in CFR No.507 of 2025, they moved an application under Rule 32 of Civil Rules of Practice r/w Section 151 of CPC, which is numbered as I.A.No.284 of 2025. Learned trial court has dismissed the same with an observation that the General Power of Attorney (for short ‘GPA’) holder cannot file a suit for declaration of legal heirs of the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners/plaintiffs have filed a suit to declare them as legal heirs of Late Stephen Sampath Kumar Sadanandam @ Ch.Sampath Kumar, S/o. Sadanandam as successors of his estate. Learned trial court has erroneously dismissed the application without assigning any reasons, misread the affidavit and prayed to allow the CRP.

5. On perusal of the copy of plaint in CFR No.507 of 2025 (suit), which goes to show that petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top