IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Mohammed Fazil Iqbal – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 12960/2025
THE HONOURABLE SMT.JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12960 of 2025
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings in CC No.1903 of 2023 on the file of the X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad for the offences under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 448, 427 and 506 IPC.
2. Heard Sri T.V. Kalyan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a bonafide purchaser and that there are title disputes over the flat and a civil suit is also pending between the parties over the subject matter. But, initiating criminal proceedings against the petitioner cannot be maintained and hence, prayed to quash the proceedings against the petitioner.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the de facto complainant has a registered sale deed in his favour while the petitioner is relying upon a notarized agreement of sale which is alleged to be a fake document and that the document needs to be tested during the course of trial. He, therefore, prayed to dismiss the petition.
5. Perused the record.
6. The allegations point out a property dispute between the de facto complainant and the petitioner. Further, it is alleged that the petitioner has created a fake notarized agreement of sale by committing forgery. Thus, prima facie allegations against the petitioner point out the offence of forgery. Though, the matter is of civil nature, once there is an element of criminality, the criminal proceedings cannot be quashed as was held in Kathyayini v. Sidharth P.S. Reddy & ors, 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 712. Hence, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings at this stage. However, it is deemed appropriate to
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of court provided he is represented by a counsel on every date of hearing before the trial court and he shall be present before the trial
court as and when his presence is required during the course of trial.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA October 17, 2025 KTL
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.