SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67180

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Vanguri Narsimha – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Ambuji Padmamma – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1985 of 2024

ORDER:

Heard Sri Jella Srikanth, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, Sri A. Ravinder Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Bommineni Vivekananda, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 2, 9 and 10, Sri Krishna Kishore Kovvuri, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 7 and 11 and Ms. Sarampally Mrudula, learned counsel for respondent No.12. Perused the entire record.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.818 of 2023 in O.S.No.121 of 2014 dated 13.06.2024 by the learned V Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, (‘trial Court’), wherein an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, to condone delay of 78 days in filing application under Order IX Rule 13 of C.P.C. in O.S.No.121 of 2014 has been dismissed.

3. The background facts are that respondent Nos.1 and 2 have filed a suit for partition and separate possession with a prayer to pass preliminary decree allotting 1/9th share to them and pass final decree with respect to the suit schedule property consisting of agricultural land in Sy.No.342 to an extent of A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top