AND F.C.A. No.174 of 2014

JUDGMENT:

(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)

Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and respondent. We have perused the record.

2. Respondent/wife has filed an application vide O.P.No.221 of 2012 under Chapter XI Section II of Mohammedan Law, seeking restitution of conjugal rights. The same was allowed. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, appellant/husband filed the present appeal.

3. The marriage of the appellant with the respondent was performed on 28.11.2010 as per Muslim Rites and Customs. Thereafter disputes arose between them. According to the respondent, family members of the appellant harassed her and sent her to her parents’ house. Her parents approached elders a happy marital life. Appellant refused for the same and demanded for additional dowry. He has also threatened the respondent that he would perform another marriage. She has also narrated about the certain facts including filing of application dated 20.09.2011 to Khazi, Warangal, requesting to resolve the issue. They were not in a position to resolve. Therefore, she has filed the aforesaid application before the learned Family Court, Warangal, where she has examined herself as PW.1 and also examined PWs.2 to 5. She has filed Exs.A1 to A4 including Ex.A2 – legal notice, dated 11.10.2011, Ex.A3 – legal notice, dated 29.08.2012 and Ex.A4 – Khazi report with true translation, dated 20.09.2011. To disprove the claim, respondent therein examined himself as RW.1 and not exhibited any documents.

4. On consideration of the said evidence, both oral and documentary, the Family Court allowed the said petition and conjugal society within two months from the date of the said

order.

5. There is no interim order in the present appeal. As discussed supra, learned Family Court considering the depositions of PWs.4 and 5, close relatives of respondent herein, allowed the said O.P. There is no error in the impugned order. It is a reasoned order. The appellant herein failed to make out any case to interfere with the said order.

Therefore, this appeal is liable to be dismissed.

6. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

K. LAKSHMAN, J VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, J

16^th October, 2025.

PNS