IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
SHAIK ADIL PASHA – Appellant
Versus
SEEMA ANJUM – Respondent
AND F.C.A. No.174 of 2014
JUDGMENT:
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)
Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and respondent. We have perused the record.
2. Respondent/wife has filed an application vide O.P.No.221 of 2012 under Chapter XI Section II of Mohammedan Law, seeking restitution of conjugal rights. The same was allowed. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, appellant/husband filed the present appeal.
3. The marriage of the appellant with the respondent was performed on 28.11.2010 as per Muslim Rites and Customs. Thereafter disputes arose between them. According to the respondent, family members of the appellant harassed her and sent her to her parents’ house. Her parents approached elders a happy marital life. Appellant refused for the same and demanded for additional dowry. He has also threatened the respondent that he would perform another marriage. She has also narrated about the certain facts including filing of application dated 20.09.2011 to Khazi, Warangal, requesting to resolve the issue. They were not in a position to resolve. Therefore, she has filed the aforesaid application before the learned Family Court, Warangal, where she has examin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.