SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67290

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Sri.Vemula Venkatesh S/o. V. Gandaiah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary – Respondent
WP 34474/2017



O R D E R:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“…to issue a writ or direction more so particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondent No.5 in issuing prohibitory order in proceedings No. Lr.No. B/ROR/1437/2017 and Lr.No.B/ROR/1438/2017 under section 145 of Cr.P.C. proceedings by ordering to promulgate to initiate with immediate effect in respect of lands in Sy. No.50 to an extent of Acs.9-00, situated within the limits of Rajapur Village and Mandal until finalization of the ROR case by the Tahsildar (Respondent No.11), Rajapur is directed to taken over the possession and kept under Govt, Custody of above lands immediately, as illegal and uncalled for is without jurisdiction, without notice-and without hearing the petitioners and trying to evict them from the possession of agricultural lands in survey nos. 50/AA and 50/A-AA to an extent of Acs.9.00 situated at Rajapur Village and Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, Telangana State by declaring it as arbitrary, , illegal and contrary to the rules and by setting aside the same by directing the respondents 5 and 11 not to interfere in the above dispute which is pending before the competent civil court i.e Honble Junior Civil Judge at Jadcherla in 0.S.No 45 of

2017...”

2. None appeared for the petitioners.

3. Heard Mr. M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 8.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that as the proceedings passed under Section 145 of Cr.PC would be in force for a period of one year and due to lapse of time and as those orders were not renewed, the contest of the petitioner does not survive.

5. I have perused the materials on record.

6. The petitioner’s contention is against promulgation of prohibitory orders under Section 145 Cr.P.C by respondent No.1. 7. Having regard to the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader and as the impugned order as on that date is not in force, nothing further survives in this matter as the contention had been effectively redressed. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________ N.TUKARAMJI, J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top