THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.31349 of 2025

ORDER :

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“...pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to mutate the names of the respondents 5 to 9 for entire lands in survey No.230 extent Acs.6.30 gts instead of Acs.2.10 gts, situated at Chandravelli Village, Bellampalli Mandal, Mancherial District even though the petitioners raised objections through multiple representations/objections on 06.10.2025, 25.08.2025, 22.09.2025 as arbitrary and illegal and in violation of the principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the Bhu Bharathi Act, 2025 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the representations/objections dated

06.10.2025, 25.08.2025, 22.09.2025 and to pass...”

2. Heard Sri Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and perused the record.

3. Since no adverse orders are being passed against respondent Nos.5 to 9, the notice to respondent Nos.5 to 9 is dispensed with.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that one Kommari Rajaiah is the owner of the land to an extent of Acs.6.30 guntas in Sy.No.230, situated at Chandravelli Village, Bellampalli Mandal, Mancherial District and the ancestors of the petitioners are in possession of the subject lands from the year 1955 onwards. In the year, 1955 the name of the father of petitioner No.1 is reflected in the revenue records and the same is continued for several decades. Father of petitioner No.1, father of petitioner Nos.2 and 3 and father of respondent Nos.5 to 9 are in possession of the subject property and partitioned each to an extent of Acs.2.10 guntas and they are in possession of their respective shares.

5. Learned counsel further submitted that all of a sudden, the name of the father of respondent Nos.5 to 9 was reflected in the revenue records in possession column even though, the fathers of the petitioners are in possession and taking advantage of the same, respondent Nos.5 to 9 in collusion with the revenue authorities are trying to mutate their names in the revenue records for the entire extent of Acs.6.30 guntas in Sy.No.230. The petitioners raised objections through representations dated 06.10.2025, 25.08.2025 and 22.09.2025 to respondent Nos.2 to 4. Despite receiving the said representations, respondent Nos.2 to 4 did not act upon the same and are trying to mutate the names of respondent Nos.5 to 9 in the revenue records for the land to an extent of Acs.6.30 guntas in Sy.No.230.

Hence, the present writ petition.

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions would submit that the representations made by the petitioners said to have been sent through registered post, if received, shall be examined by issuing notice to the concerned parties and necessary orders will be passed.

7. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent-authorities to consider the representations dated 06.10.2025, 25.08.2025 and 22.09.2025, and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, by putting the petitioners, respondent Nos.5 to 9 on notice, since the original landlord has not been made party to this writ petition. The respondent-authorities are also directed to issue notice to the original landlord and affording them an opportunity of hearing. If, respondent-authorities are not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioners, they shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order, communicate a copy of the said order to the petitioners and complete the said exercise within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no or