THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.29818 OF 2016

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“…to issue an order, direction or a writ particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not taking any action and not registering FIR inspite of the petitioner representation dated 24-8-2016 under the provisions of Land Grabbing Act in respect of illegal grabbing of Government road admeasuring 60 sq.yards in survey No.124 situated at Gopanpally village, Serilingmpalli mandal, Rangareddy District and trials of illegal construction works by blocking the road and disturbing the general public ingress and egress as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also against the provisions of Land Grabbing Act 1982 and the provisions of Indian Penal Code and consequential directions to the respondents to cause the arrest of the persons mentioned in petitioner complaint dated 24-8-2016 by registering FIR against them and protect the public property i.e., Government road admeasuring 60 sq.yards in survey No.124 situated at Gopanpally village, Serilingamaplli mandal, Rangareddy District immediately and to pass.….”

2. None for the petitioner.

3. Heard Mr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents No.1 to 5 and Mr.Godugu Mallesham, learned counsel representing Mr.G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent No.10.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, based on the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 24.08.2016, Crime No.313 of 2016 was registered. It is further submitted that the allegations in the said complaint disclosed the commission of a non-cognizable offence, and hence, the police sought appropriate directions from the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 155(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Pursuant to such permission, the matter was duly investigated, and after completion of the investigation, a final report was filed on 31.12.2016, classifying the case as “lack of evidence.” Thus contends that the grievance raised in the present writ petition stands effectively redressed, and therefore, nothing further survives for adjudication.

5. I have perused the material placed on record.

6. The grievance of the petitioner, as urged in the writ petition, was that his representation dated 24.08.2016 had not been acted upon by the concerned police authorities. However, from the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader and the record now placed before this Court, it is evident that the petitioner’s representation was duly considered, Crime No.313 of 2016 was registered, the investigation was completed, and a final report was filed classifying the matter as “lack of evidence.”

7. In light of the above factual position, it is clear that the petitioner’s grievance has been effectively addressed, and no further direction is warranted from this Court.

8. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

_______________ N.TUKARAMJI, J Date: 15.10.2025

CHS