IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
G KRSIHNA MURTHY – Appellant
Versus
C SURYAKANTHAM – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
COMMON ORDER:
Since the issue involved in these Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of the same Original Suit No.11 of 2015, between the same parties, they are being heard together and disposed of by way of this common order.
2. The C.R.P.Nos.559, 575 and 590 of 2018 are filed against the Orders dated 03.11.2017 in I.A.Nos.68, 80 and 57 of 2015 respectively in O.S.No.11 of 2015 passed by the learned V Additional District Judge (FTC), Warangal at Jangaon.
3. Heard Mr.R.K.Chitta, learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs. Inspite of service of notice none appeared for the respondents, as such respondents are set ex-parte. Perused the record.
4. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners herein filed O.S.No.11 of 2015 on the file of V Additional District Judge (FTC), Warangal at Jangaon, seeking recovery of possession of the suit property. It is stated that I.A.No.68 of 2015 is filed seeking to implead respondent No.20, I.A.No.80 of 2015 is filed seeking to implead respondent Nos.23 to 27 and I.A.No.57 of 2015 is filed seeking to implead respondent Nos.20 to 23 respectively in O.S.No.11 of 2015 to avoid multiplicity of lit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.