Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
Commscope India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Commissioner (Appeals-I) – Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN
ORDER:
Sri Narendra Dave, learned counsel appears for M/s. Lakshmi Kumaran & Sridharan, learned counsel for petitioner.
Smt. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income-tax appears for respondents.
2. In the appeal preferred by the department under Section 107(2) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘CGST Act’) against Refund Sanction Order (RFD-06) dated 07.10.2022, passed by respondent No.2/Refund Sanctioning Authority/original authority - Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax, Gachibowli Division, Rangareddy Commissionerate, the appellate authority vide impugned order dated 29.09.2023 has set aside the said order holding that the Refund Sanctioning Authority has erred in classifying the service as export of service without examining nature of service, pla
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's services did not qualify as 'Intermediary Services' and that the place of supply of services was not in India as per the rele....
The court emphasized that in case of voluminous transactions of export of services to customers located outside India, transaction-wise FIRC is not feasible and a consolidated FIRC issued by the Bank....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article