SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67487

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. HYDEABAD – Appellant
Versus
N LAXMI ADILABAD DIST AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO CMA.No.632 of 2016

ORDER:

The present appeal is filed under Section 30 of Employee’s Compensation Act, assailing the order in W.C.No.25 of 2007 dated 19.06.2015, passed by Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Adilabad.

2. Appellant is the O.P.No.2. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are the applicants and respondent No.3 is the O.P.No.1 in W.C.No.25 of 2007.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned authority failed to appreciate the facts that the employee was not in the employment or discharging his employment duties under his master at the time of accident and the commissioner failed to look into the counter filed by O.P.No.1 in W.C.No.25 of 2007 that he did not admit that the victim died in the course of his employment while driving his tractor, it is only an after call and developed version causing loss to the exchequer of the insurance company and that the victim was going to his house on the directions of his master, prayed to allow the appeal.

4. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2-applicants submits that no substantial question of law is made out in the appeal and the order passed by the Commissioner of Labour, Adilabad, does n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top