THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

ORDER:

This criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.673 of 2025 against the petitioner-accused No.1 on the file of Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Shadnagar, for the offences under Sections 353, 323, 504 and 506 IPC.

2. Heard Mr.Madanu Naresh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Shalini Saxena, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has never assaulted any public servant and that he never obstructed their official duties. The allegations levelled against the petitioner are false and that the complaint itself shows that it was filed with delay, wherein it is stated that the alleged incident has occurred on 06.03.2021, but it is filed on 08.03.2021 and the cause for the delay also is not explained, which itself shows that it is a concocted case against the petitioners. He further submitted that in Manik Taneja and another v. State of Karnataka and another, (2015) 7 SCC 423 it was held that force or assault must be made out to attract the

ingredients of offence under Section 353 IPC. He further