THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.17259 and 21495 of 2025

COMMON ORDER:

The petitioners in both the writ petitions are seeking cancellation of draft Layout vide T.L.P.No.111/2024/H with C.No.3497/256/2024/H e-Panchayat dated 11.07.2024 issued to the respondent No.5 in Sy.Nos.93, 94P, 95P, 111, 115P, 116, 117P, 118P, 120P, 121P, 151P and 152P, Yenkepalli Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District and in view of common cause of action, the writ petitions are disposed of by this common order.

WP.No.17259 of 2025:

2. The petitioner claims to be the owner of land admeasuring Ac.1.08 guntas in Sy.No.95, AAM, Yenkepelli Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District (Schedule A Property) by virtue of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 10.05.2024 entered into between the petitioner and his family members, who are shareholders of two companies, namely, M/s. GB Bakers Industries Private Limited and M/s. Golconda Textiles Private Limited. In a case pertaining to the above two companies viz. COMPANY APPEAL (AT) (CH) No. 111 of 2022, the Tribunal referred the parties to mediation and a consensus was reached between the parties to settle their disputes and accordingly, entered into a Memorandum of Compromise dated 10.05.2024.

3. It is stated that the petitioner and his brother, Mustafa Alam Khan, whose names are shown at Sl.Nos.1 and 2 in the memorandum, were allotted Ac2.16 guntas in Sy.No.95 of Yenkepelli Village. The petitioner and his brother had equal share of Ac.1.08 guntas each. The names of the petitioner and his brother, Mustafa Alam Khan, are mutated in the revenue records vide Khata No.408.

4. It is stated that on 20.04.2025, when the petitioner visited the Schedule A Property, he was shocked to notice that an 80-feet wide road was being laid down by the respondent No.5. On due inquiry with the concerned authorities about the permission for the said road, the petitioner came to know that the impugned draft layout permission vide T.L.P.No.111/2024/H which was obtained by the respondent No.5 in Sy.No.93, 94P, 95P, 111, 115P, 116, 117Р, 118Р, 120Р, 121Р, 151P and 152P, Yenkepelli Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District. The petitioner approached the respondent authorities vide letter dated 23.04.2025 and requested them to cancel the layout permission granted to the respondent No.5.

5. It is stated that the respondents No.2 to 4 have failed to verify the documents of the respondent No.5, which wrongly includes Schedule A Property belonging to the petitioner. The petitioner also lodged a police complaint. However, the respondent No.5 with political influence colluded with the local leaders.

As a result, the complaint/representation has not been acted upon.

WP.No.21495 of 2025:

6. The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.2.11 guntas in Sy.No.152/3 and Ac.2.12 guntas in Sy.No.152, total admeasuring Ac.4.23 guntas (Schedule B Property), situated at Yenkepelli Village and Gram Panchayat, Pudur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (presently Vikarabad District). The petitioner acquired the Schedule B Property by virtue of a registered sale deed bearing Document No.4049 of 2016 dated 02.05.2016 and the vendor of the petitioner purchased the said land from the previous owner under a registered sale deed bearing Document No.118/2014 dated 08.01.2014 and registered sale deed bearing Document No.2411 of 2014 dated 09.06.2014. The name of the petitioner was mutated in the revenue records and she was issued Pattadar Pass Book vide Patta No 804 and Pass Book and Title Deed No.039624 by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Pudur Mandal.

7. It is stated that as there was interference some persons, namely, Sita Ram Venu Gopal, G.Gangadar Goud and Hyder, the petitioner filed a suit for perpetual injunction in O.S.No.291 of

2021 before the Junior Civil Judge, Pargi, Ranga Reddy, wherein ad interim injunction order was passed in I.A.No.709 of 2021 in O.S.No.291 of 2021 dated 21.10.2021. It is stated that Hyder is a