SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67622

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Sri AniReddy Laxma Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 16877/2025



ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal.

2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondent Nos.1 to 5 in issuing Look Out Circular Notice vide No.01/SIC/LOC/ACK/2025/2500001962 dated 24.01.2025 against the petitioner on the basis of C.C.No.570 of 2025 pending on the file of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate-cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge at Suryapet arising out of Crime in F.I.R.No.91 of 2024 dated 28.04.2024 on the file of 5th respondent without following due process of law as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, besides violative of Principles of Natural Justice, consequently, seeking a direction to set-aside the above said Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner.

3. Subsequent to the file of this writ petition, when the matter has been taken up on 07.10.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is now staying in India, as the petitioner has lost his job in Malaysia and the petitioner would be continuing to stay in India and would co-operate in F.I.R.No.91 of 2024, dated living in India and would co-operate with the trial in C.C.No.570 of 2025 pending on the file of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate- cum-II Additional Junior Civil Judge at Suryapet arising out of Crime in F.I.R.No.91 of 2024 dated 28.04.2024, the Look Out Circular Notice vide No.01/SIC/LOC/ACK/2025/2500001962 dated 24.01.2025 issued against the petitioner is set-aside. However, the petitioner is directed to appear in the trial Court as and when matter is listed. It is made clear that if the petitioner is avoiding to appear in the trial Court, it is left open to the respondent authorities to follow due procedure as contemplated under law for further course of action against the petitioner.

5. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

No order as to costs.

_________________________________

4496

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top