SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67648

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Pulakala Venkanna – Appellant
Versus
Vankayala Gandhi – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.684 OF 2019

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in I.A.No.367 of 2018 in O.S.No.187 of 2014 on the file of VII Additional District Judge, Khammam, wherein the respondent No.1 herein/plaintiff therein filed an application I.A.No.367 of 2018 under Order 38 Rule 5 read with section 151 of CPC for attachment of Suit Schedule Property before judgment which was acquired from Respondent/Defendant No.1 by way of gift deed in favour of Revision Petitioner.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed in the trial Court as petitioner/plaintiff or respondent/defendant.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff i.e. Respondent No.1 herein filed a suit for recovery of sum of Rs.15,19,559/- initially as against the respondent No.1/defendant No.1. During the pendency of the suit, an application was also filed by the respondent under Order 38 Rule 5 of the CPC seeking attachment of the said properties.

Subsequently, during the pendency of the suit, it is brought to the knowledge of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top