SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67658

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Bellampally Raji Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Bellampally Sammi Reddy – Respondent


THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.396 of 2022

ORDER:

The present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India assailing the order in I.A.No.710 of 2018 in O.S.No.148 of 2010, dated 15.04.2021 passed by learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Huzurabad, filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 2,742 days.

2. Petitioners are the defendants and the respondent is the plaintiff in O.S.No.148 of 2010.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the trial Court ought to have seen that summons/notices in O.S.No.148 of 2010 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Huzurabad are not served on the petitioners to enable them to appear before the Court and ought to have verified whether summons are served on the petitioners or not. The trial Court ought to have seen that there is sufficient cause in not approaching the trial Court within time to set aside the ex parte decree and the petitioners came to know about the ex parte decree in the RDO appeal where the respondent has filed a copy of the order passed in O.S.No.148 of 2010 dated 10.02.2011. Delay occurred in filing the petition in s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top