SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67679

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Kallu Nikhil Kumar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, who is alleged to be a suspect in an unregistered crime.

2. Heard Sri P.Achut Rama Shastry, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri E.Ganesh, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was earlier arrayed as an accused in FIR No. 36 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). He further submitted that despite the issuance of a notice under Section 35(3) BNS, the de-facto complainant has been attempting to lodge further complaints against the petitioner with an intent to harass him. Therefore, he prayed that this Court be pleased to grant pre-arrest bail by allowing the Criminal Petition.

4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, contending that no report or complaint has been formally registered, and no FIR exists against the petitioner at present. Hence, in the absence of any regi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top