SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67969

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
CHAIRMAN AP TRANSCO. VS. HYD AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
MARAMULLA LAXMI AND 4 ORS – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA AND

COMMON JUDGMENT:

The appeal suit is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the Appellant/Defendnats against the judgment and decree passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Huzurabad, Karimnagar, (hereinafter referred to ‘learned trial court’) in O.S.No.15 of 1998, dated

25.04.2001.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed before the learned trial court.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs being the legal heirs of the deceased viz., Veeraswami, have filed a suit for recovery of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) with an interest of 18% per annum for the damages from the date of death of the deceased Veeraswamy from the defendants.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the deceased on the intervening night of 27/28.10.1997, at 2:00 a.m. was returning from the cattle shed situated in front of his house after tying the bulls in the cattle shed, suddenly the current wires with equipment fell down from the pole and the deceased came in contact with the live wire due to which he died on the spot. It is contended that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top