SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 68610

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
P. DHEERAJ RANGA REDDY HYD – Appellant
Versus
PRL. SECRETARY REVENUE DEPT. HYD AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent
WP 36478/2017



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD *****

WRIT PETITION NO.36478 of 2017 and batch Between:

P.Dheeraj Ranga Reddy …Petitioner AND The State of Telangana,, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and four others …Respondents COMMON JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 26.09.2025 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

1. Whether Reporters of Local : Yes/No newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may : Yes/No be marked to Law Reports/Journals

3. Whether Their Lordship/Ladyship : Yes/No wish to see the fair copy of judgment _____________________ JUSTICE K.SARATH THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH +WRIT PETITION NO.36478 of 2017 and batch %Dated 26.09.2025 # P.Dheeraj Ranga Reddy …Petitioners AND $ The State of Telangana,, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and four others …Respondents ! Counsel for Petitioners : Sri P.Sashidhar Reddy : Sri S.Srinivasa Chary and Sri K.Sridhara Chary ^ Counsel for official Respondents : Mrs.Tekuru Swetcha, Learned Assistant Govt. Pleader for Revenue Mrs.S.Sravanthi, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registrations < GIST :

> HEAD NOTE :

? Cases referred : 1. (2011) 8 SCC 670

2. (2010) 15 SCC 207

3. 2023 SCC Online TS 2727 4. 2023 SCC Online Hyd 815

5. Judgment in WA No.1484-2017 dt.03.03.2022 Of the High Court for the State of Telangana

6. 2018 SCC Online Hyd 2096

7. 2019 SCC Online TS 2504 8. 2025 SCC Online SC 630

9. 2022 (8) SCC 210 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION Nos. 36478 of 2017, 16657 of 2020 and 1280 of 2024

COMMON ORDER:

1. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners are questioning the action of the respondent/ Sub-Registrar, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District in entertaining and registering the Cancellation Deeds dated 23.09.2017, pursuant to the letter No.E1/4294/2017 dated 22.09.2017 addressed by the District Collector, Ranga Reddy to the Tahsildar, Shamshabad, who has addressed letter to the Sub-Registrar, Shamshabad in Lr.No.1604/2017 dated 23.09.2017 to cancel Seventeen (17) sale deeds including the sale deed of the petitioner in WP No.36478 of 2017 and sale deeds of the vendors of the petitioners in WP Nos.16657 of 2020 and 1280 of 2024 in respect of lands covered in Sy.Nos.38, 54, 55 and 56 situated at Bahadurguda village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject property’), without issuing any notice to the petitioners or their respective vendors and requested to revive the cancelled documents.

2. Since the lis involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, they were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by way of this common order.

3. Heard Sri P.Sashidhar Reddy, Sri S.Srinivasa Chary, and K.Sridhara Chary, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Mrs. Tekuru Swetcha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Mrs.S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents.

i) FACTS OF THE CASE IN WP No.36478 of 2017

4. The case of the petitioner is that he purchased land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.7.21 guntas in Sy.No.38 and another extent of Ac.18.34 Guntas in Sy.No.55, total admeasuring an extent of Ac.26.15 Guntas situated at Bahadurguda Village of Shamshabad Mandal, through registered sale deed dated 20.12.2007, registered as No.133/2008 on the file of Sub-Registrar, Shamshabad from one Mr.Khader Ali Khan and others, represented by the AGPA Holders, for a valuable sale consideration and since then he has been in possession of the said land. After purchase of the said land, the petitioner made an application for mutation and for issuance of Pattadar Pass Book and title deeds. Pursuant thereto, the then Tahsildar, Shamshabad Mandal issued a Memo No.434/2004, dated 11.04.2008 to the effect that the application filed by the petitioner for grant of mutation in respect of the lands purchased by him cannot be considered.

5. It is further case of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top