Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
A.K.S.S. Prasad And 2 Others – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana And 3 Others – Respondent
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.26682 OF 2021
ORDER:
Heard Sri D.Srinivas, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1, Sri M.Mehboob Ali, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3 and Smt. C.Vani Reddy, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.4.
2. The petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
“…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 in not refund the total Tuition Fees of the petitioners after their cancel the admission, violating the guidelines issued by the respondent No. 2 and 3 is arbitrary, illegal, violation of A
Refund policies established by educational bodies prevail over institutional guidelines when addressing admission cancellations.
Withholding original academic qualification certificates by the college is impermissible in law.
The court established that delays in seeking relief under Article 226 do not bar claims when fundamental rights are violated, especially in cases involving mistakes or fraud.
The mandatory conditions for refund can be read down to be directory in nature, especially when the student subsequently indicates allotment in the second counselling and reasons for forsaking the al....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article