THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3274 of 2025

O R D E R:

Challenging the docket order, dated 01.09.2025 passed in I.A.Nos.291 and 292 of 2025 in O.S.No.109 of 2024 (old O.S.No.254 of 2014) by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Kodad, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. By the impugned order, the applications filed by the respondents-petitioners-plaintiffs under Section 151 of CPC and Order XVIII Rule 17 r/w. Section 151 of CPC to reopen and recall the evidence of PW4 for marking of endorsements on the backside of Exs.A1 and A2 were allowed.

2. Heard Mr. Shaik Madar, learned counsel for the petitioners- respondents-defendants and Ms. Charishma Atla, learned counsel representing Mr. V.Seetharama Avadhani, learned counsel for the respondents-petitioners-plaintiffs. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Sessions Court erred in allowing the applications filed by the respondents for reopening the evidence and recalling PW4 at a belated stage, after completion of arguments. The respondents have not assigned any valid and justifiable reasons and the delay is abnormal and inordinate.

Recalling PW4 for marking end