SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 68665

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Aileni Vinod Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana. – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.8975 OF 2025

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner – accused seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.39 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate (for Prohibition & Excise Offences), Nalgonda, registered for the offences under Sections 304-A, 337, 338 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’)

and Section 181 and 196 of the M.V Act.

2. Heard the submissions of Sri D. Jaipal Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 – State.

3. The learned petitioner counsel has submitted that the petitioner was not driving the car at the time of alleged accident and that it was driven by one Prashanth who too died in the accident. He further submitted that just to demand money, from the petitioner herein, the de-facto complainant has come up with a false story that he was driving the car at the time of accident. He further submitted that initially 161 Cr.P.C statements were recorded by the Police. The witnesses have stated that it was driven by one Prashanth who died in the accident, but subsequent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top