THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29901 of 2025

ORDER (ORAL):

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief:

“...to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned unnumbered Notice vide No. UC/C 21/TPS/GHMC/2025 dated 17-09-2025 in respect of the property of the petitioner in Plot No.99 North Part admeasuring 77.77 Square Yards or equivalent to 65.0 Square Meters in Survey No.204/2 consisting with Stilt for Parking plus 2 Upper Floor to an extent of 60.38 Sq meters situated at Madeenaguda Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District as illegal arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and set aside the same Consequently direct the respondent No 2 not to interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoy of the petitioner over his property bearing Plot No.99 North Part admeasuring 77.77 Square Yards or equivalent to 65.0 Square Meters in Survey No.204/2 consisting with Stilt for Parking plus 2 Upper Floor to an extent of 60.38 Sq meters situated at Madeenaguda Village Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District ...”

2. Heard Mr. V.R. Mannepalli, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing for respondent No.2; and perused the material on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner obtained the building permission through self certification vide File No.001051/GHMC/00378/IR/C21/2025, dated 23.07.2025 in respect of the property bearing Plot No.99 North part, admeasuring 77.77 square yards in Survey No.204/2, situated at Madeenaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and he constructed building comprising of Stilt for parking + 2 upper floors admeasuring 60.38 square meters in the subject property in accordance with the sanctioned plan. However, without proper verification, the impugned show cause notice dated 17.09.2025 was issued to the petitioner, which is in violation of principles of natural justice. As such, the petitioner was constrained to approach this Court.

4. Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC submitted that if any action is to be taken against the petitioner, due process of law will be followed. 5. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 not to interfere with the construction undertaken by the petitioner without following due process of law. However, the petitioner is directed to submit reply to the show cause notice dated 17.09.2025 within a period of seven (7) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such reply, respondent No.2 shall conduct necessary enquiry, by giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four (4)

weeks thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.

_______________________

B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J Date: 26.09.2025 Nsk