THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

ORDER:

Heard Sri N. Niyatha, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Smt S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. With their consent, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on earlier occasion, this Court passed order in W.P.No.33090 of 2023 dated 06.12.2023 and directed the respondent authorities to register the documents presented /pending before the respondent authorities with regard to the same survey number without reference to the Notification dated 26.09.2013. The subject land in the present writ petition also pertains to the same survey number and also similar letter issued by the respondent No.6 in Lr.No.E1/3387/2024, dated 03.10.2024. In view of the same, the respondent No.4 issued impugned Refusal Order No.224 of 2025, dated 05.07.2025 is arbitrary and illegal.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is a chequered history of Sy.No.44 situated at Maktha Mahabubpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. With regard to the entries of Sy.No.44 in revenue records, the orders passed by the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration in File No.P3/456/2013, dated 29.05.2014 was set aside by this Court earlier in W.P.No.23574 of 2014, dated 17.01.2017 and granted liberty to the authorities to take action as per the order passed by the Joint Collector in E1/7306/1999 on 19.01.2013 and the Joint Collector in his order dated 19.01.2013 directed the Deputy Collector and Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District to examine the records in respect of the subject lands and if he found any fabricated material produced relating to fraud for issuance of supplementary sethwar and for obtaining correction of revenue records, file comprehensive Civil Suit for declaration of title and for recovery of possession in favour of Government in accordance with law. Aggrieved by the orders in W.P.No.23574 of 2014, dated 17.01.2017, the respondent authorities have filed W.A.No.1499 of 2018 and the same was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court on 25.11.2024. In spite of that the respondents again showing the suit schedule property in the prohibited list and the same is contrary to the orders of this Court.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Court passed orders in W.P.No.33090 of 2023, dated 06.12.2023 and directed the registering authorities to register the lands without reference to the notification dated 26.09.2013. The subject land in the present writ petition also pertains to same survey number and the letter of the respondent No.6 in Lr.No.E1/3387/2024, dated 03.10.2024 is before the dismissal of W.A.No.1499 of 2018, dated 25.11.2024. Basing on the letter dated 03.10.2024 issued by the respondent No.6, the respondent No.4 issued impugned Refusal Order No.224 of 2025, dated 05.07.2025 and the same has to be liable to be set aside.

5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration is not disputing the disposal of the W.P.No.33090 of 2023 dated 06.12.2023 and also the orders in W.P.No.23574 of 2014, dated 17.01.2017 and W.A.No.1499 of 2018 dated 25.11.2024 and requested to pass appropriate orders.

6. Recording the above submission made by learned counsel on either side and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the Registering Authority to receive, register and release the subject document presented by the petitioners, without reference to the letter dated 03.10.2024 issued by the respondent No.6 and without reference to the impugned Refusal Order No.224 of 2025, dated 05.07.2025 issued by the respondent No.4, subject to the petitioner complying with the provisions of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and Indian Stamps Act, 1899. It is al