SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 68777

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
Sham Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE P.SAM KOSHY CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.2269 of 2025

ORDER:

Heard Mr. M.V.Pratap Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner /

defendant No.1; Mr. Sharad Sanghi, learned counsel for respondent No.1 / plaintiff, Mr. M.Pramod, learned counsel for respondent No.2, and Mr. Mounik Reddy, learned counsel, representing Ms. Manjari S. Ganu, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4.

2. The instant Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by defendant No.1 assailing the order dated 28.04.2025, in I.A.No.1379 of 2024 in O.S.No.746 of 2014, passed by the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad.

3. The petitioner herein is the defendant No.1 and respondent No.1 herein is the plaintiff before the Trial Court. For convenience, they will hereinafter be referred to as per rank before the Trial Court.

4. Vide the impugned order, the Court below has allowed the aforesaid I.A. filed by defendant No.1 under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) for amendment of the plaint by incorporating para 7(a) and 7(b) after para 7 of the plaint, serial Nos.16 and 17 at para

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top