SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 68793

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
Dr.P.Krishna Malakonda Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 20489/2025



THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO.20489 OF 2025

ORDER:

Heard Sri L.Ravi Chander, learned senior counsel, representing Sri Bobbili Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned Government Pleader for Services-I for respondents.

2) The case of the petitioner is that he is presently working as senior-most Professor of Cardiology at Osmania Medical College i.e. respondent No.3 College and serving as Head of the Department of Cardiology. Further, he has successfully completed DM (Cardiology) and chose to serve in the Government sector. Further, as a Super Specialist in Cardiology, he treated thousands of heart patients who could not afford private healthcare. Further, during Covid-19 pandemic also, he rendered dedicated service and successfully treated numerous Covid-19 patients. While so, during general transfers-2024, the petitioner requested the respondents to transfer him to Warangal. However, as his services are very much essential in respondent No.3 hospital as he is the senior-most Doctor in the Super Specialty of Cardiology for PG Teaching and patient care, the respondents have retained him in respondent No.3 Hospital. It is further averred that by showing the name of the petitioner, respondents made the National Medical Council to allot cardiology seats. While so, respondent No.1 having decided to effect promotions on a temporary basis to the posts of Additional Director of Medical Education including Principal of a Medical College and Superintendent of a Teaching General Hospital, has directed all the eligible Professors, including the petitioner, to submit Annual Confidential Reports (ACR) of the candidates to be promoted. As the petitioner is keenly interested in teaching and also due to his mother’s health condition, which requires continuous medication and regular follow-up and also due to other personal and family reasons, he submitted an option form dated 28.06.2025 requesting the respondents to consider his case for promotion to the post of Principal in any one of the five medical colleges at Sanga Reddy, Quthbullapur, Vikarabad, Hanumakonda and Nalgonda. However, without considering the said options, the respondents, under the guise of promotion, have transferred the petitioner to a non-teaching post i.e. Superintendent of Government General Hospital, Nizamabad, vide impugned G.O.

dated 07.07.2025. But, as the petitioner is not in a position to discharge the administrative responsibilities and also lack of interest in administrative work, he submitted a representation dated 09.07.2025 requesting the respondents to permit him to forego the promotion, retain and continue him in the post of Professor of Cardiology and HOD (Cardiology), Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad. However, without considering his representation, the respondents are compelling the petitioner to accept the promotion, taking steps to relieve him from the post of Professor of Cardiology and HOD (Cardiology), Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, and also to fill up the said post with another person. Therefore, the action of the respondents is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice and infringement of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to Rule 11 of the State and Subordinate Service Rules.

3) Learned senior counsel has contended that as per Rule 11 of the State and Subordinate Service Rules, all the candidates who are promoted are entitled to forego their promotion and nobody can insist the petitioner to join in the promotion post. An option was left open to the employee to forego promotion subject to the condition that they would forfeit their promotion for the current panel year. Since the petitioner has agreed to forego promotion, the respondents are duty bound to continue the petitioner as Professor of Cardiology and HOD (Cardiology), Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad. However, contrary to Rule 11 of the Stat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top