SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 68914

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Kamalla Balamma – Appellant
Versus
The Stte of Telangana – Respondent
WP 29519/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.29519 of 2025

ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioner herein is claiming that she is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.2-20 guntas in Sy.No.630/6 and Ac.0-26 guntas in Sy.No.643/3, situated at Mankhal Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangareddy District. In proof of the same, she has filed copies of the latest passbook and title deeds. According to the petitioner, the said land is patta land. Even then, in the latest passbook, it is mentioned as “Lavoni patta”. In proof of the same, she has filed pahanies for the years 1975-76, 1987-88, 1988-89, 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98, 1999-2000, 2003- 04, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015- 16. In the copies of the said pahanies, the subject land is mentioned as ‘patta land’. According to the petitioner, there is wrong entry in the latest passbook and title deeds. She has submitted an online application bearing No.2500051638 dated

01.07.2025 to respondent No.3 with a request to correct the wrong entries and issue fresh e-pattadar passbooks and title deeds. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said online application, respondent No.3 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.3, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

3. Whereas, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.3 will consider the said online application submitted by the petitioner and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

4. In the light of the said submissions, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to consider and dispose of the aforesaid online application bearing No.2500051638 dated 01.07.2025 submitted by the petitioner and take steps in accordance with the procedure laid down under law. If respondent No.3 is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall pass orders assigning specific reasons and communicate a copy of the same to the petitioner. He shall complete the entire exercise within a period of sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________

K. LAKSHMAN, J

25.09.2025 sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top