SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 68976

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Smt. G. Sarala – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Allam Kamalamma and another – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1668 of 2019

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C.

by the revision petitioner/defendant No.2 aggrieved by the order, dated 15.04.2019 passed in I.A.No.292 of 2018 in O.S.No.19 of 2018 by the learned Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as “the trial Court”), wherein the application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 to condone the delay of 42 days in filing the petition under Order IX Rule 13 of C.P.C. was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent No.1 herein has filed O.S.No.19 of 2018 for grant of perpetual injunction in her favour against the revision petitioner and another restraining them from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. In the said suit summons were issued and as the defendants therein did not chose to contest the said suit, an ex parte judgment and decree was passed by the trial Court granting perpetual injunction in favour of respondent No.1 herein and against the revision petitioner and respondent No.2 herein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top