SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 69162

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
K.Laxman Goud – Appellant
Versus
V. Vittal Gupta – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India by the petitioners-defendant Nos.1 to 2 aggrieved by the order passed in IA No.658 of 2017 in O.S No.67 of 2016 on the file of the XII Additional District Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Heard Sri C.Raghu, leaned Senior Counsel, representing Sri R.Giri Kumar learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri K.Ramesh Kumar, representing Ms.S.Munjula Devi, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. The petitioner Nos.1 & 2 herein are the defendant Nos.1 & 2 therein and respondent No.1 herein is the plaintiff therein. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed before the learned trial Court.

4. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff has filed a suit for specific performance and praying the Court to direct the defendants to execute the register sale deed in respect of suit schedule property in favor of the plaintiff in terms of Agreement of sale, dated 08.01.2016, conveying title to the plaintiff for sale consideration amount of Rs.55,00,000/- and in alternatively to refund the earnest mone

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top