SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 69216

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Ch. Subhashini – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 12473/2025



HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12473 of 2025

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.962 of 2025 on the file of Chandanagar Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 316(4) and 314 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’).

2. Heard Sri Anirudh sadhu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State.

3. Though this petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in the crime, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner has sought for directions to the Police to proceed with investigation by issuing notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) (Previously Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.).

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has not disputed the same.

5. Considering the submissions of both the counsel and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that the allegations are under Section 316(4) and 314 of the BNS and the punishment prescribed for the said offences alleged against the petitioner is less than seven (07) years. Hence, without going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer on or before 17.10.2025 between 11:00 a.m. and 05:00 p.m. and in turn, the Investigating Officer is directed to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 (3) of the BNSS (previously section 41-A of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973) and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 scrupulously. However, the petitioner shall submit her defense and co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents/material required for the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Officer shall consider the

same and shall complete the investigation strictly in accordance with law.

6. With the above said observations, this Criminal Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________________

JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

23.09.2025 GV

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top