SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 69420

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
A.Narsimha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Vavilla Sravan Kumar – Respondent


THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2198 OF 2025

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking to quash the order dated 07.04.2025 in I.A.No.239 of 2024 in O.S.No.14 of 2024 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nagarkurnool (hereinafter referred to as “the trial Court”)

2. Heard the submissions of Sri V. Hanmanth Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri B. Srinivasulu, learned counsel for the respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that a petition to appoint Advocate Commissioner for examining physical features of the land was filed by the respondents herein and that the trial Court has allowed the petition by granting more than the relief that is asked in the petition. Aggrieved by the said orders, the present petition is filed. He further submitted that the Advocate Commissioner cannot collect the evidence, but he can only examine the physical features. Hence, he prayed to set aside the orders passed in I.A.No.239 of 2024 and pass appropriate orders. He further submitted that they do not have any objection if Advocate Commissioner is appointed for examining the physical features, but nothing more th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top