SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 69492

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
P. MALLANNA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
P. SANGAPPA AND 13 OTHERS – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL.NO. 412 OF 2013

JUDGEMENT:

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (herein referred as CPC), being aggrieved by the orders dated 15.02.2013 passed in I.A.No.675 of 2012 in O.S.NO.02 of 2001 by Ist Additional District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, wherein in I.A. filed under Order 9 Rule 9 read with Sec.151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was dismissed. Being aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is filed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff herein has filed a suit for partition and separate possession of the suit scheduled property against the respondents/defendants Nos.1 to 8 initially, and subsequently impleaded the defendants Nos.9 to 13. The case of the appellant/plaintiff was that when the matter was posted for trial on 05.06.2012, on the said date the senior counsel was out of station on his personal work, and though the junior counsel was present and sought for an adjournment, since there was a direction from the High Court, the trial Court recorded the said representation, and dismissed the suit. The said dismissal was challenged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top