SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 69916

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Konda Ramu – Appellant
Versus
Sri Ram Srinivas – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2253 OF 2025

ORDER:

This revision is directed against the propriety of the order dated 20.09.2024 passed in I.A. No. 618 of 2023 in O.S. No. 344 of 2014 by the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Karimnagar.

2. Heard Mr. Sureddy Priyanka, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Sajan Kumar, learned Counsel for respondents.

3. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit, who instituted the proceedings seeking a declaration and perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property (hereinafter referred to as “the subject property”). During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short “CPC”), seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner in respect of the subject property, namely, a house site adjacent to House No. 2-99/A, admeasuring 347.33 square yards, situated at Asifnagar Village, Karimnagar Mandal and District. The purpose of the appointment sought was to direct the Commissioner to note down the physical features of the subject proper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top