THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in promoting the petitioner as Controller/ADC on par with the unofficial respondents, who were promoted vide proceedings dated 04.04.2025, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Heard Sri V. Narasimha Goud, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri U. Shanthi Bhushan Rao, learned Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. The petitioner herein is only claiming promotion on par with the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 17 and he is not challenging their promotions whatsoever. As such, since no prejudice would be caused to the unofficial respondents, this matter is taken up for disposal without issuing any notice to them.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner joined the services of respondent Corporation as a Conductor during December, 1990, after undergoing due process of selection. Subsequently, his services were regularized, w.e.f., 31.12.1991. While so, respondent No.3 had called for records of the Conductors and Drivers eligible for promotion to the post of ADC/Controller, purely on the basis of seniority in the feeder cadre. Thereafte