IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Narakongu Nagamani – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.16492 OF 2023
ORDER:
Heard Sri Nayakwadi Ramesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Sri Kamalakara Rao Bathina, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
“…to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring challenging the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.C/869/2022 dated 10.03.2023 of the 4th respondent by rejecting the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment as VRA in place of her father late Sri Gopaiah, who expired while in service, solely on the ground the 5th respondent has filed an objection as illegal, arbitrary, void ab initio and violative of due procedure of law and violative of the scheme enunciated by the Government for compassionate appointments and consequently set-aside the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.C/869/2022 dated 10.03.2023 of the 4th respondent by directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate grounds as VRA in place o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.