SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 70009

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
IMIMDISETTI ARUNA JYOTHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TELANGANA – Respondent


THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.11980 and 12020 of 2025

ORDER:

These petitions are filed seeking quashment of the C.C.No.4627 of 2024 on the file of learned III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, against the petitioners/accused Nos.2, 3, 5 and 6.

2. Heard Mr.M.Krishna Chaitanya, learned counsel for petitioners and Smt.Shalini Saxena, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the in-laws of the de facto complainant. He further submitted that the petitioners have never harassed the de facto complainant, and that there are no specific overt acts attributed to them, nor any specific allegations sufficient to attract the offences under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’), and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short, ‘DP Act’). He further submitted that the petitioners never had an occasion to reside with the de facto complainant, nor did they have any intention to harass her. He, therefore, prayed to quash the proceedings against the petitioners.

4. Lear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top