SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 70087

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Shri Udasin Mutt House No.20-3-311 Hussaini Alam – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Secretary – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No. 23136 OF 2009

O R D E R:

Assailing the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 14-10-2009 which directed the 4th respondent – Executive Officer to take/assume complete charge of Petitioner Mutt, this Writ Petition is filed, on the ground of violation of the provisions of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for brevity, 'the Act').

2. During the hearing, petitioner has taken out I.A.No. 1 of 2025 to receive the additional affidavit along with material papers annexed thereto treating the same as part and parcel of the Writ Petition.

3. Petitioner Mutt is one of the oldest Hindu Religious Mutts in Hyderabad and owns Acs.540.30 guntas of land in Survey Nos.1010/1 to 1015, 1024, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1066, 1067 to 1070 of Kukatpally Village. By registered lease deeds, dated 23-07-1964, 14-09-1996, 21-03-1969 and 20-04-1978, said lands were leased out to M/s Indian Detonators Limited and IDL Chemicals Limited for a period of 99 years and since then, the said companies are in possession of the land.

3.1. It is stated, deponent was recognized as M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top